Academic Writing

3000 word essay, excluding references. Harvard style. 100% plagiarism free. Need completed in 48 hours. Due Sunday 11th. Find below the scenario. "Mr C is a 70-year-old man with dementia and long-standing lung disease. He is cared for by his 72-year-old wife. He has frequent chest infections for which he receives antibiotics and he requires oxygen at home because of his lung disease. His most recent chest infection has not responded well to antibiotic tablets and his general condition is deteriorating. He is not eating and is drinking little. It is possible that, with hospital treatment, including intravenous antibiotics and physiotherapy, he may recover from this infection, although he is bound to develop a similar infection again in the near future. Admission to hospital in the past has caused him distress because he does not cope well with changing environments. His wife, however, says that she thinks that he should go to hospital so he can be given maximum treatment" 1. Critically discuss the application of ethical theories or approaches to your ethical dilemma. 2. Demonstrate the contrasting perspectives, which highlight that there is a dilemma and how through the effective application of the ethical theories can enhance the decision making process. 3. Discuss the 4 principles approach, autonomy/beneficence/non maleficence/justice. Provide enough analysis and detail to substantiate your ethical approach. Additional points to discuss: 1. Describe the case-study containing an ethical dilemma. This should be no more than 200 words. (Make sure your dilemma is realistic). 2. Identify the ethical issues the dilemma raises � there will be more than one. 3. Identify the different people involved, describe how each one might view the dilemma, and explain why they take this position. (Different people might include patients, users, carers, family members, the general public, pressure groups, front-line professional workers, health and social care assistants, youth workers, service managers). 4. Identify and discuss potential conflict(s) and points of agreement in terms of ethical arguments. 5. Consider how gender, ethnicity, religion, age, sexuality, etc might influence how people respond to the ethical dilemma. 6. Consider how far relevant codes of professional conduct and law, as applied to the dilemma, help with arriving at a moral solution.